Any trade in the futures market has essentially a binary outcome, the market either goes up or the market goes down. Of course, I am aware of the fact that you might well argue that the market stays the same and claim an anti-binary bias, but the fact of the matter is the market seldom, if ever, stays the same. Price movement is constant, especially in the scalping style of trading.

The problem arises with oscillators, which essentially measure market momentum. We are all aware that the price can easily, and often does, decline during a period of time that momentum oscillators show postive momentum. This is a constant problem traders face when trading with momentum based oscillators. We all want to trade with the trend, and I have a personal trading style that precludes any counter-trend trades. My psche simply can’t endure the relative success/failure rate on counter-trend trades. I will also freely admit that counter-trend trades can often be among the most profitable trades you can make. The problem arises when you take into consideration the relative failure rate, and/or false indications in the change of the trend. That being said, I usually strike an 89 period simple average line on my trading charts and ignore all trades above or below this line. It is a simple way to stay with the trend. It is a bit primitive, though.

As a general rule, I like to trade 233 tick charts, which, I realize, is a bit faster moving than some individuals prefer to proceed, but I have grown quite accustomed to idiosyncrasies of this chart configuration and usually profit handsomely for the information gleaned from tick charts. You can get a great idea as to the current volume in the market by how fast the bars fill. So I generally don’t chart volume, but glean the velocity of the market by the pace at which the bars fill. Incidently, I am a candlestick guy, for no particular reason other than I have always traded candlesticks.

But let us return to the inherent flaws in momentum oscillators in discerning price movement. Again, I reiterate that momentum in the market can appear to be positive, whiile the price is actually falling. This is a situation that often results in losing trades, and endless frustration for the trader. After all, one reasons that if the market is in an upward swing, how in the heck does the price action suddently veer to the negative?

The realization is a simple one: Price momentum and price action do not always have a positive correlation. Now this is a difficult, often impossible, concept for some traders to conceptualize.

My answer to the problem is a fairly simple one. I use dual time frame oscillators to chart my trades? On the one hand, I use a longer time frame oscillator to get a feel for the overall momentum of the market, and a shorter term oscillator to determine the the actual price action in the market. I have experimented for years with different settings to achieve optimal results, and for scalping I have become comfortable with a 60 period look back on the longer term oscillator and a 15 period look back on the shorter term oscillator. In effect, I get a good guage on both the momentum of the market and the price action in the market,

One quick note: I can notice when the momentum is falling and the price is falling and find it easier to pick up on trend reversals. While the system is not foolproof, it gives the trader an accurate picture of what is actually occuring in the market, and good information if he or she decides that taking that all-to-risky counter-trend trade has a decent probability for success. Myself, I usually wait until the trend has really changed before I jump into a trade, but great money, some of the best money, can be made for those who are not of the faint-of-heart and can bring themselves to trade against the trend.

The keep point of this discussion is simple: Momentum oscillators are essentially flawed because they are not great indicators of price action. Trade in a dual time frame setting and increase your chances for success in trend reversals.