Archive for ‘technical trading’

Choppy Markets

By , 10 September, 2008, No Comment

Today was an especially difficult day to trade. As a matter of fact, I traded for about 1 hour and stopped as the choppiness in the market made it very difficult to stay in a trade. Some of the candlestick formations stretched 3-7 points which is a higher risk tolerance than I can endure. Not that the direction identification was wrong, but surviving the turbulence to stay in the trend became very costly. The only option is expand your risk tolerance past 12tick stops, which for me is too much risk to take. So my trading was curbed today.

The announcements of Lehman Brothers has been scapegoat quoted by most analysts, and I feel like the revelations unnerved a good number of traders. On days like this I stop, as I feel as if I am “guessing” at the market direction. The market did settle down some later in the day, and resumed a more normal trading pattern.

The important lesson is knowing the market conditions that lend themselves to profitable trading and market patterns that are difficult to trade, at least trade systematically. Very early in my career I would hang in there and battle the market, usually losing money, and as I have gotten more experienced there are days that are simply hard to trade. Today was a day like that for me, as I was stopped out of my first three trades….and I stopped. and saved myself some money and frustration. -9 pts on 3 contracts. A very disappointing day.

You really can’t spend more money than you take in…unless you are the government….

By , 9 September, 2008, No Comment

As I begin trading this morning I read this interesting article about our government out of control spending. As citizens of this nation, we seem disinterested in the fiscal policies of our government, as long as we get our fair share. This is a great article about the functioning of our Congress and president….and ultimately we will bear the brunt of our own crushing debt. Click here to read this article.

Some trading rules….

By , 10 August, 2008, No Comment

I am a scalper, so I am not terribly interested in long term trends, Elliot Wave theory or any market trading technique that requires me to think ahead much more than one half day. That is to say that I am trying to carve out 2 pts. or more out of intraday directional movement. I truly believe that the market is random, so when I use the word “trend” I am not using in the sense that a technical trader would. The truth is, I use the “trend” for lack of a better word to describe intraday directional movement.

Since the market moves in many random ways, my trading method only seeks to take advantage of a tendency for people “hop on the bandwagon”. People will generally watch the market and jump into a trade when they see it heading one way or the other, and they generally stay in the trade too long. People tend develop strong emotional ties to a trade they make. They get into the mindset that the market “ought” to do something based upon some information they have gleaned, or some event that has occurred or is occurring. From the onset, let me say that the market does not “have” to do anything and freeing yourself from this mindset will greatly improve your trading. The markets are not rational, and you will drive yourself crazy trying to rationalize the movement you see unfolding on your chart.

Since I believe that the market moves randomly via fractals, or fractal movement, I do not believe that identifiable patterns form. This always gets my technically oriented friends in a ruffle, and I am often cursed for this belief. An overwhelming amount of evidence has been collected by academics to prove that the market is random that it is difficult for me to fathom that some people trade with chart patterns. By chart patterns I am talking about the species of technical formations typified by “head and shoulders patterns, pennants, double tops, double bottoms, etc” In short, I do not use any chart patterns in my trading.

On the other end of the spectrum, I do not have any use for fundamental trading either. For scalping, it should be self evident that we do not use fundamental principles. If they actually worked, most fundamentals take at an intermediate period of time to develop. My trades are anywhere from 1 minute to 30 minutes….I have been in very few trades longer than thirty minutes. But I’ll go a step further on this topic and offend all the disciples of Ben Graham and Modern Portfolio Theory….I think it’s about as valid to use as chart formations. Note to self: Is the screaming and yelling I am hearing from the back of the room? Are they throwing things at me yet?

My thesis for rejecting Modern Portfolio Theory is really simple: just because a company is well run, has products of high quality, and a healthy cash flow does not mean that the stock price will go up…just look at Cisco for the five years before it’s big move last year. Here was a company that was doing everything right but the stock price stayed pegged at around $20 for years, and there are countless examples of this being true. So I don’t use P/E ratios, beta coefficients, alpha coefficients and all the other investment terms that go hand in hand with this style of investing.

No, what I like are little spurts of unpredictable momentum. Other than fractal theory, there is no viable explanation for the gentle (and sometimes violent) rocking pattern that is part of every chart. Of course, the problem has always been ascertaining when these little bursts of momentum take place. How can you time your entry and exit points to take advantage of rocking (or swaying) that is on every chart? How do you know which sway is going to be 5 pts and which one will be a sideways move?

I have taken the liberty of drawing a dark line so you can see the swaying action in the market, and you will notice that some market moves are very short and some are very long. How do we get into the market for the long moves, and stay out of the short moves?

So…..now that I have offended every modern day investment theory out there…lets talk some about what I DO…INSTEAD OF DWELLING ON WHAT I DON’T DO.

There are many things I keep in mind when I trade, but I have 4 rules that I never deviate from. Some of these rules were hammered into my head by my mentor nearly 20 years ago, others were learned the hard way- through experience.

1. Never trade without stops in place. I can’t imagine a trader trading without a stop order in place, and am amazed when I talk with other traders at how many trade without placing stops. I suppose you might try to justify trading without stops by saying that you are sitting right there at the computer and will be able to trade out of any position before you can get in trouble. This is not true….without stops you have no way to account for the lightening fast moves that can come about from catastrophic news…The ES contract moved 71 pts in one 1 minute bar after one of the last rate cut announcements. Granted, you can have a move gap through one of your stops, but this is so rare as to have only happened to me once. Even on the 71 point move I was able to exit with a stop executed. Without stops you are taking excessive risk. Also, the stop is also a mental stop. As I have said, traders can become emotionally attached to their positions and the stop serves to remind them that they are getting out of the market whether they like it or not.

2. Never let a winning trade become a losing trade...this is one of the most difficult things to learn. When do you pull the trigger to exit? Of course, there are many oscillators that can give you a pretty good idea when the trade is over….but I have watched trader after trader get 3 points up and become convinced that market is going through the roof. It seldom does, and what generally happens is the trader rides the trade right back down to breakeven or a losing position. We will talk at length about how to avoid this….but exit strategy is seldom easy. And for those of you wondering, I can’t stand trailing stops.

3. Avoid trading against the trend…but if you must, cut the number of contracts you normally trade in half. I chant “the trend is my friend” twenty times before going to bed every night. And I still make bad trades, almost always against the trend. How do you know what the intermediate and short term trends are? I make it easy, I chart an 89 period Simple Moving Average and when the price is above the moving average I concentrate on long trades, and conversely, when it is below the 89 period average I concentrate on short trades…this silly little rule will save you money.

4. Be on the right side of the trade…have you ever done this? You have considered a trade carefully after watching it set up exactly the way you dream of. Everything is perfect, except the trade skitters sharply the wrong way when you execute. Most traders will watch the price crash into their stops and chalk it up to experience. You don’t have to be stopped out on every losing trade. If the darn thing looks like a dog out of the gate, and your oscillators even confirm this, get out….I’ll say it again, you don’t have to ride every trade into your stops. It takes a tremendous amount of ego reduction to do this….you have to admit to yourself that you were dead wrong from the onset and take a smaller loss than hitting your stops. It not as easy as it sounds.

Some Random thoughts at Midday

By , 7 August, 2008, No Comment

NQU8 09-08-08 (click chart to enlarge)

ESU8 09-07-08 (click chart to enlarge)

I generally trade from 6:30 a.m. until about noon, and today I am stopping at 11:00 a.m. I had emergency hernia surgery three days ago and feel like I am losing my mental edge on the market. I usually trade the ES contract pre-open, and then switch to the NQ contract once the markets are open and settle down some. The NAR released data this morning that suggested that some relief might be in sight for the housing problems that have been a component in the markets recent volatility.

As a trader I am not particularly concerned about data in the report, only what kind of impact the news will have on the markets or, more importantly, how the other traders will react to the news in the report. It is not unusual for the market to receive news and react instantly then take a moment to digest the information and turn the other way. This phenomena is especially true on the reports released before the opening, usually at 7:30 a.m. Of course, it’s important to keep abreast of when these reports and announcements will be released and tread very lightly as they become public. Since it is not unusual for the markets to gap up or down as the information becomes available, stops are of little value. I prefer to not to be in the market when the news is about to be released…..but I will have OCO orders bracketing a position to take advantage of the exaggerated movement in the market, if there are any.

I run my stops in the 12 tick range and set multiple profit targets so I can take advantage of any exaggerated movement that may occur unexpectedly. Like most traders, I want my trades to run, if possible….of course, I am usually looking for the fractal-type configurations to formulate my exit strategies. I also calculate pivot points, but use a logarithmic methodology to avoid the straight line mentality you will hear me rail about. I will calculate the Fibonacci retracement levels in a run, but use them with guarded reliance, as they are irrelevant on many days. On the other hand, especially days that are low volume and traded very technically, the market may follow the Fibonacci levels to the tee. Of course, I am always drawing support and resistance levels as they become obvious…..add some Bollinger bands, CCI and mathematically altered MACD oscillators and I am set. I do not use trend lines, or any other linear type calculation.

Today was a relatively easy day to trade as the market moved for extended periods of time in one direction, which is a traders dream. I captured 11 points @ 10 contracts.

Just Chaos

By , 5 August, 2008, No Comment

Fundamental traders have no extra time for the technical traders, and technical traders battle with the Efficient Market rabble, who constitute the vast majority of market theoreticians, for coherent interpretation of the unruly and unpredictable beast we refer to as “the market”. Of course, reams of academically-sound market studies proclaim the inherent correctness of the Efficient Market Theory. Why…no less than the eminent Dr. Burton Malkiel trumpets the sheer futility in considering anything short of Efficient Market Theory. No, one cannot argue with facts laid bare in slick PowerPoint presentations with glossy charts and multi-colored tables, that’s for sure, and yet there is something missing, something so essentially important that no theorist dare utter the words...equity market theory seldom translates into profitable trading.

And that’s a real problem for me. If a market theory is irrefutably true on paper it ought to have some phenomenal performance in practice. Of course, this is seldom the case.

For those who might have missed it, we’ve put a team of astronauts on the moon. We have unravelled the the vagaries of the quantum mechanics with startling accuracy, and teased the destructive power of atomic structure to produce enough nuclear weapons to obliterate ourselves tenfold. Why, we have even sequenced the double helix structure of of our own DNA
molecule. We are talking about the very building block upon which life is based, a structure so complex that literally billions, not millions, but billions of gene strands comprise it’s makeup.

But we have failed miserably at predicting where the market is going to move at a given point in time.

Yet we argue on as to who is right and who is wrong. It seems to me that I learned in my college Argumentation class that something true at face value, and provide proofs to that end, before you can argue your point. So it would seem a bit imprudent to argue about which theory holds true when we have proven to ourselves, over and over, that no theory has predicted, with any accuracy, where the market is going to be at a given point in time.

My one-watt brain cell demands that a FACT has to hold up time after time to be true. One cannot argue the untrue into truth. For example, these are facts:

  • 1+1=2 (unless you’ve digested Liebnitz’s arguments)
  • The moon revolves around the earth in a given arc and is not made out of cheese.
  • George Bush is the President of the United States.
  • We will all die

I think you get my point here. It is impossible to argue untruth into truth through a sheer volume of words. So I’ve managed in 21 years of trading at the institutional and retail level to establish only one irrefutable FACT

  • We have an incomplete knowledge base about the market and there is not a method to predict, with 100% accuracy, what the market is going to be valued at a given point in time.

Which leaves me out there with the lunatic fringe scratching my head in bewilderment. Yet I am a consistently profitable trader. I live in the very uncertain world of fractals, strange attractors and chaos theory. Yes, you heard me say it….CHAOS THEORY

The real problem with all market theories, in my opinion. is that they are linear in nature. Of course, even a cursory observation of any equity chart exposes the distinct non-linear pattern typical of the equity markets. It is not possible to predict even from bar to bar where he market is headed. No, a binary outcome is after each bar is the best you can hope for. That is to say there is a probability from bar to bar whether the market will go up or down or stay the same. And when trading, probabilities are the best we can hope for…and careful observation of market fractal mini-structures can be teased from the charts. Which is not to say that fractal structures are the Holy Grail in trading, but they are reliable predictors in non-dynamic markets….that is, markets unaffected by catastrophic or peculiar outside occurrences.

Of course, this type of thinking turns the world inside out….after all, we linear thinkers and are programmed to see patterns in the world and formulate patterns based upon observation. I am 5’7″ and weight 210 pounds and have gray hair. My boss is also 5’7″ and weighs 210 pounds, and yes…he has gray hair. So it stands to reason that 5’7″ and 210 pound men must all have gray hair. Of course, that is a simplistic view of our linear thinking process, but it serves it’s purpose well enough…and that is correlating variables of an infinite set is, at best, a dicey endeavor.

No, I’ve learned that the secret to the market lies in thinking in a non-linear fashion, and blocking out what seem to be obvious correlations. There are no obvious correlations in a non linear world….only fractals. Are you with me?

Easy AdSense by Unreal