Posts tagged ‘emini chart’

ES Emini Day Trading: Pivot-Fed Announcements-Commentary

By trader7757, 16 December, 2009, No Comment
ESZ9
For 12/16/2009

How To Use
Symbol R1 R2 Pivot S1 S2
ESZ9 1114.58 1120.42 1109.92 1104.08 1099.42

Fed and Fed Agency Announcements

Housing Starts
[Report][Star]
8:30 AM ET
Current Account
[Report][Bullet
8:30 AM ET

Consensus Analysis

MBA Purchase Applications

Released on 12/16/2009 7:00:00 AM For wk12/11, 2009
Prior Actual
Purchase Index – W/W Change 4.0 % -0.1 %

Highlights
MBA’s purchase index slipped 0.1 percent in the Dec. 11 week with the refinance index up 0.9 percent. Mortgage rates remain extremely low, at 4.92 percent for 30-year loans. Housing starts for November will be released at 8:30 ET this morning and are expected to show a gain following a drop in October.

Consumer Price Index

Released on 12/16/2009 8:30:00 AM For November, 2009
Prior Consensus Consensus Range Actual
CPI – M/M change 0.3 % 0.4 % 0.2 % to 0.6 % 0.4 %
CPI – Y/Y change -0.2 % 1.9 %
CPI less food & energy 0.2 % 0.1 % 0.1 % to 0.2 % 0.0 %
CPI less food & energy – Y/Y change 1.7 % 1.7 %

Highlights
The consumer price report for November was calming on most financial markets despite the rise in the headline number. Both the headline and core numbers were much less inflationary than yesterday’s scary PPI numbers. Headline consumer price inflation jumped 0.4 percent in November after gaining 0.3 percent the month before. The November headline matched the consensus forecast. Core CPI inflation-in contrast with yesterday’s core PPI run up-eased to 0.0 percent (no change) after a 0.2 percent increase in October. The consensus had called for a 0.1 percent rise.

The headline number was boosted mainly by a 4.1 percent surge in energy costs after a 1.5 percent gain in October. Gasoline was up 6.4 percent, following a 1.6 percent gain the month before. Food price inflation was soft in November with a 0.1 percent rise-the same as in October.

Within the core, declines in shelter indexes offset increases in costs for new and used motor vehicles, medical care, airline fares, and tobacco. Shelter costs declined 0.2 percent in the latest month, led by a 1.5 percent drop in lodging away from home. Owners’ equivalent rent dipped 0.1 percent. Hotels-including resorts-continued to engage in heavy discounting. High unemployment is keeping rent soft in general.

Year-on-year, headline inflation increased to plus 1.9 percent (seasonally adjusted) from minus 0.2 percent in October. The core rate was unchanged in November at up 1.7 percent. On an unadjusted year-ago basis, the headline number was up 1.8 percent in November while the core was up 1.7 percent.

Inflation is still high at the headline level but it is not as severe as earlier indicated by the PPI for November. A flat reading for the CPI core suggests that a sluggish economy is keeping underlying inflation tame for now.

Housing Starts

Released on 12/16/2009 8:30:00 AM For November, 2009
Prior Consensus Consensus Range Actual
Starts – Level – SAAR 0.529 M 0.575 M 0.540 M to 0.600 M 0.574 M
Permits – Level – SAAR 0.552 M 0.584 M

Highlights
Housing starts looked good for November but most of the gain was largely a comeback and then some in multifamily starts-a volatile component. The single-family component posted only a partial rebound. Construction companies picked up the pace of groundbreaking for new homes as housing starts in November rebounded 8.9 percent, following a revised 10.1 percent plummet in October. The November pace of 0.574 million units annualized came in right at the market forecast for 0.575 million units and was down 12.4 percent on a year-ago basis. The latest comeback was led by a 67.3 percent rebound in multifamily starts, following a sharp 29.5 percent plunge in October. Meanwhile the single-family component edged up 2.1 percent after a 7.1 percent fall the month before.

By region, the November rebound in starts was led by 16.4 percent rebound in the Northeast with gains also seen in the South, up 12.3 percent; Midwest, up 3.0 percent; and West, up 1.9 percent.

Homebuilders are modestly optimistic about ramping up the pace of construction as housing permits in November rebounded 6.0 percent after falling 4.2 percent in October. October’s pace of 0.552 million units annualized was down 24.3 percent on a year-ago basis.

Today’s housing starts report is good but should be seen in the context of October’s weak numbers. The two months together indicate that housing is in a slow recovery. The bad news is that the recovery is slow. But the good news is that the housing construction recovery is slow-anything more robust at this point would not be sustainable.

FOMC Meeting Announcement

Released on 12/16/2009 2:15:00 PM
Prior Consensus
Federal Funds Rate – Target Level 0 to 0.25 % 0 to 0.25 %

Market Consensus Before Announcement
The FOMC announcement for the December 15-16 FOMC policy meeting is expected to leave the fed funds target rate unchanged at a range of zero to 0.25 percent. However, traders will be watching to see if the “extended period” language is qualified with any additional wording regarding the future path of the fed funds rate. Traders also will look for updates on the Fed’s view of the recovery and on the Fed’s plan for unwinding balance sheet expansion.

ES Emini Day Trading: Charting Software

By trader7757, 12 December, 2009, No Comment

I like my chart to layout in a certain fashion, and I want my software to have the ability to allow me to layout my charts in the manner I feel comfortable.

ES Emini Day Trading: Pivot-Fed Announcements-Commentary

By trader7757, 6 December, 2009, No Comment

As would be expected, much better-than-expected numbers for the November employment situation sent equities up sharply early in the day on Friday. But by close, stocks had come down significantly as many traders simply worried that equities have gotten too far ahead of economic conditions. Also, the dollar jumped on the release of the jobs report and weighed on materials and energy sectors. Still, for the day and week, most indexes posted moderate to sizeable gains.

ES Emini Day Trading: Chart Trading Patterns-Part 2

By trader7757, 1 December, 2009, No Comment

Wedges are considered continuation patterns. The rule of thumb when analyzing or trading an established trend is to follow the trend until it breaks or transitions to a sideways market cycle. The break of a trend is defined by prices trading through the resistance of a downtrend or the support of the uptrend. Wedges can help a trader find an entry point within the context of a trend—which, contrary to belief, is a difficult thing to do correctly. Just because a market is trending doesn’t mean that any entry with the trend is a good one. The wedge offers a trader a point at which to short resistance at the upper downtrend line or play the reversal of the trend, which also is defined by the upper downtrend line.

Chart patterns can develop simultaneously across multiple time frames as well, so they are particularly well suited to handle any trader’s demand, from the end-of-the-day trader to the most hyperactive daytrader. So far, we have looked at chart patterns as they have developed in the indexes, however, chart patterns are especially accurate in the forex market due to its 24-hour trading. The US dollar/Japanese yen 15-minute chart in Figure 3 shows a symmetrical triangle forming.

chart
Click to Enlarge

A symmetrical triangle is formed with a downtrend line and an uptrend line. Earlier, we mentioned that understanding a pattern’s quality is crucial to trading patterns—that every pattern is not a trade, but a potential set up. This pattern is a good quality symmetrical pattern for a number of reasons. The two keys to look for are the balance of the pattern and the balance of price.

Specifically, we are looking for the two trend lines to form a triangle that is squeezing price in a way that if we were to imagine folding the pattern in half lengthwise, the angles would be almost identical. In other words, the angle of the trend lines must be balanced. The other visual cue to be aware of is whether prices are balanced within the pattern. This balance can be seen if prices are bouncing off both the downtrend and the uptrend lines. As this symmetrical triangle pattern was developing, another pattern on the US dollar/Japanese yen was also shaping up. A rising wedge was developing on the 15- and 30-minute charts (Figures 4 and 5, respectively).

chart
Click to Enlarge

chart
Click to Enlarge

As you can see, both of these patterns were using some of the same touch points to create the uptrend lines. In rising wedges, there are two uptrend lines where the lower one is support and the upper one is resistance. In rising wedges, we must be especially mindful of the lower uptrend line support because this is the level at which we can buy a bounce. If this level breaks, it could signal a reversal of the uptrend in which the pattern formed.

These two patterns were not the only opportunities a chart pattern trader could take advantage of. Another 15-minute rising wedge had also formed and this wedge was a larger pattern (Figure 6).

It used many of the same touch points, but the difference between this rising wedge and the smaller rising wedge is that the “look back” of this pattern was longer. Look back is the amount of data used to form the pattern. In this case, you can see that the look back goes to 7/31, as opposed to the smaller wedge that originated on 8/1. This may seem like a small difference, but consider that the charts are 15-minute time frames and that each new hour presents four new candles. The difference of even just six hours is 24 new candles from which to connect touch points and create a pattern.

chart

Let’s look at some more examples. Again, remember all your studies should be geared toward training your eyes to notice the nuances of patterns because this allows you to make the distinction between good, better, and best patterns. So far, we’ve looked at patterns that are dominated by trend lines. Now let’s examine patterns formed by more horizontal levels.

A rectangle pattern is similar to a channel. The difference between the two is that a channel is typically narrow and a rectangle is wider. It’s much like the difference between accumulation and distribution. Just like triangles, rectangles (and channels) can develop simultaneously across multiple time frames.

Let’s take a moment to discuss time frames. Ultimately, which time frame you chose to trade should be based upon the quality of the pattern and risk/reward ratio it presents. Other considerations are more individual.

For example, if you are an intraday or full-time trader, many shorter-term time frames will be available to you for analysis. However, if you are a part-time trader or someone who prefers to look at the charts once or twice a day, then certainly, longer-term intraday charts, like the 240-minute chart or the daily will suit your time constraints or preference. Regardless of your preference, it must be said that chart patterns that develop on daily charts are more psychologically significant than those that develop on any intraday time frames. This is mainly because daily charts are by far the most followed by the general public.

My philosophy on time frames runs somewhat counter to the prevailing approach. While most traders look to longer time frames to confirm the movement on a shorter time frame (known as multiple time frame confirmation), I do not subscribe to this.not at all. In fact, my belief is that the smaller time frames are the “canary in a coalmine” and give a trader acute and more sensitive cues to shift in the market. Taking this one step further, treat each time frame as a stand alone and remember that the 15-minute chart is the building block to the 30-minute, and the 30-minute is the building block to the 60-, to the 240-, and then to the daily. A trend shift starts on the shorter time frame, and if that shorter time frame persists enough, it will affect the larger time frame, and so on.

One of my students told me that I described this effect as the “stream leading to the river leading to the ocean.” I frankly can’t remember saying it, but it sure is accurate! So the 30- and 60-minute charts would be the stream, the 180- and 240-minute charts the river, and the daily the ocean. These time frames are simply my preference when analyzing forex. Some traders use a 15-minute chart, which one of my students called the “creek that leads to the stream.” Well said.

This rectangle appears on the 15-, 30-, and 60-minute charts (Figures 7, 8, and 9, respectively).

The horizontal support and resistance levels that created the rectangle all use the same touch points. The main determination of which one to trade would be which pattern was the best example of a rectangle. After this determination, you would follow your preference for a specific time frame. As you can see, chart patterns offer accuracy, flexibility, and the boundaries traders need to identify in order to locate where we choose to enter a trade. Most of us have studied these powerful and simple-to-understand tools. Just do not make the error in thinking simple is ineffective.

chart
Click to Enlarge

chart
Click to Enlarge

chart
Click to Enlarge

My continuing trading adventure is sprinkled with many things I would have never thought I would be doing, like public speaking and seminars, online classes, software development, books, and more. In the end though, I know it’s just me and my charts. My friends and family even joke that I’m “off the chart” on weekends and vacation. When I present my trading approach at any of the Expos where everything always seems “new and improved,” “hot,” and “advanced,” I am proud to say that the people who taught me were those who traded, wrote, and taught in the early 1900’s, and that the tools to my trade are a century old. That’s before computers, television, and back when “Wall Street” was a street with a tall wall built along it! Time-tested, tried and true suits me just fine

ES Emini Day Trading: Pivot-Fed Announcements-Commentary

By trader7757, 16 November, 2009, No Comment
ESZ9
For 11/16/2009

How To Use
Symbol R1 R2 Pivot S1 S2
ESZ9 1097.42 1103.33 1090.08 1084.17 1076.83

Fed and Agency Announcement

Retail Sales
[Report][Star]
8:30 AM ET

Ben Bernanke Speaks
12:00 PM ET

We had some decent reports today and the market is off to the races.  Let’s see what Big Ben has to say later today. I have no doubt we will be treated to glowing reports and rosy prognostications.  Still, it just doesn’t feel good.

ES Emini Day Trading: More on Decision Bar Trading

By trader7757, 14 November, 2009, No Comment

I field several requests for information on DecisionBar every week.  For ES Emini day trading, it seems people are looking for that magic bullet that puts them over the top.   Trade setups are evaluated through a filtering process, which is to say that a numbers of indicators are used to select a profitable trade.

When I see a trade setup in the offing, I consciously try to find reasons not to take the ES Emini trade.  That sounds a little counter-intuitive, doesn’t it?

Not really.

One of the biggest mistakes a trader can subject himself/herself to is chasing the price action.  We have all done it, usually with disastrous results, and I consciously try to fashion a trading image of myself as a cautious trader.  Not scared, but cautious.  This may be a blow to the ego of some traders, but futures trading is no place for an ego.

Decision Bar makes a fine filtering device, and has kept me out of some ruinous trades.  It is also a great indicator for breakouts and breakdowns.  Of course, it is not hard to spot a breakdown or breakout, but when you combine the DecisionBar oscillator with the DecisionBar indicator, you find yourself will a lot of information at your fingertips.  Filter, filter, filter.

So I use DecisionBar as one of my primary filtering devices when trading.  I have found the price exhaustion signals on DecisionBar to be unreliable.  This, of course, my be a function of my reluctance to enter counter trend trades, especially when the price action is significantly above or below the 89 period SMA.  I should point out that less than four or five points on the ES Emini does not necessarily exclude a trade, but it does cause a red flag.  I want to trade with the trend and not try to make a living discerning when the market is going to change direction.

The DecisionBar manual even points out some great filtering devices to use when trading the ES Emini and use the Decision Bar program as your primary indicator.  Judging from the reviews by traders on chat boards, it is obvious that most have not taken the time to completely familiarize themselves with the manual provided.  Additionally, there is an easily accessed page on the Decision Bar site called Decision Bar hints, and this resource should be read, too.  There is a wealth of information available on Decision Bar, and once a trader learns the program, there is no reason to complain about using the program profitably.

Finally, there is some concern about the quality of customer service Decision Bar provides.  This is not my experience.  If you call customer service with a trading problem, there is a good chance you will be asked to read the manual.  However, if you have some technical issues, there is no doubt in my mind that you will find the service just fine.